In common with some
of you reading this blog, I spent much of yesterday at a seminar organised by
the Office for National Statistics (ONS) listening to assembled economists and
number crunchers puzzling over why Britain’s stagnant economy is somehow creating
jobs by the bucket load albeit at the cost of a slump in labour productivity.
As is often the case
at such events, most participants agreed there is a puzzle to solve but no one
was fully convinced by any of the suggested explanations, though the ONS was at
pains to stress there is nothing dodgy about the numbers it churns out. I
therefore left feeling rather like one of those bemused coppers in television’s
Silent Witness who can’t understand
why after hours of picking over a horribly mutilated corpse the expert
pathologists are unable to tell him how, let alone why, the victim died.
I’m no less bemused
this morning having sifted through the latest ONS labour market statistics.
There’s no doubting the headline news is good – a quarterly June to August rise
of 212,000 in the number of people in work and 50,000 fewer unemployed. August in particular appears to have been an amazingly
strong month of almost Olympian proportions in the jobs market, the ONS monthly
estimate suggesting that total unemployment may have dropped by more than
190,000 in that single month alone.
Best of all 18-24
year olds account for almost a quarter of the rise in employment, helping to
cut total youth unemployment to below 1 million. And better still, these jobs
have gone to NEETs, jobless young people not in education or training, rather
than students looking for jobs to support them through college.
Yet not everything in
the garden is rosy. 1 in 3 new jobs created in the latest quarter are ‘mini-jobs’
providing fewer than 15 hours paid work per week while more than half (54%) provide fewer than 30 hours. Moreover,
the annual rate of growth in average earnings was just 1.7%, much slower than
the corresponding rise in the Consumer Prices Index.
For millions of people in
work the downside of generating jobs in a stagnant
economy is therefore low hours at low pay and with little prospect of getting a
pay rise big enough to keep pace with price inflation. A surge in low paid mini
jobs may be better than no jobs at all but this is not a sign that the economy
is experiencing anything like a proper recovery.
Is it not true that many of these people counted as being in work are really on unpaid Workfare and so really on benefits? Do the figures distinguish between the two?
ReplyDelete