A report published earlier this week by the Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development concludes that the UK is becoming a ‘graduate
economy’, with more people now likely to have a degree than to have only
reached school-level qualifications. Yet the TUC, at its annual
gathering, this year held in Liverpool, warned that the UK is becoming an
increasingly low productivity, low wage economy. Can both these differing
perspectives be reconciled? The answer is yes, as a look at our Byzantine
occupational structure demonstrates.
Although up to around half of all people
employed in the UK today might be described as so-called ‘knowledge workers’
with professional or managerial skills, according to the Office for National
Statistics the top 5 largest single occupational groupings at present (Q2 2014)
include 1.1 million sales and retail assistants (a figure which excludes a
further 223,000 people in the separate occupational category of retail cashiers
and check-out operators), 600,000 cleaners and domestics, and 450,000 kitchen
and catering assistants (which excludes a similar number split between the
separate categories of waiters and waitresses and bar staff). The top 5 also
includes 792,000 adult care workers, providing general rather than specialist
or medical care services to the elderly, and 590,000 nurses (the latter the
only occupation in the top 5 list for which formal entry level qualifications
are necessarily required).
Moreover, while many of the occupations which have
registered the most net expansion during the recent jobs recovery - such as
taxation experts (up 88% between Q2 2011 and Q2 2014, to a total of 34,000),
advertising accounts managers (up 75% to 33,000), psychologists (up 52% to
39,000) and town planning officers (up 55% to 24,000) - require professional or
technical qualifications, high on the list also come window cleaners(up 73%, to
47,000), often unskilled odd jobbers, around 1 in 8 of whom are self-employed. Similarly,
the 10 occupations which have contracted most in the past few years encompass
skilled professionals – insurance underwriters (down 45% to 20,000 since 2011)
and social scientists (down 42% to 10,000) – and skilled manual occupations –
television engineers (down 46% to 6%), tillers (down 39% to 25,000) and sheet
metal workers (down 33% to 13,000) – but do not include any unskilled jobs.
No wonder therefore that our complex and fluid
occupational structure gives rise to so many conflicting views on how the
British way of work is changing. From one perspective it’s clear that so-called
‘knowledge work’ is firmly on the rise, requiring a high level of professional
and technical skill and offering decent pay prospects. Yet equally apparent is
a substantial bedrock of low skill, low wage service work which accounts for
the UK’s relatively high incidence of low pay, with around 1 in 5 (5 million)
employees earning less than the commonly used low pay threshold for developed
economies. While with considerable justification we like to portray ourselves
as a nation of increasingly skilled professionals, we could also reasonably be
described as a nation of shop assistants, cleaners and restaurant or café
washer-uppers.
Dear John,
ReplyDeleteI have a Biochemistry degree from a top UK uni and have been forced by a professional body to return to university for 3 years, at my own great expense in time, money and effort, in order to meet the academic requirement to work in a Biochemistry department. I am prohibited from advancing my career in the industry I work in without doing biomedical science modules.
I regard university as being intrinsically inferior to apprenticeships/internships as a means of preparation for employment. Those who work in the profession I'm heading in to similarly almost universally do not consider their university education to have been particularly useful.
I could write less than half a page of A4 on what I learned in my Biochemistry BSc... because irrelevant information is swiftly forgotten. I'm yet to encounter any evidentiary basis for the efficacy of university as a means of preparing students for employment.
I'm working at a low paid level in the industry I'm destined for and have not yet learned anything particularly useful at university, which I'm now 2 years in to. I work alongside Biomedical Scientists daily and almost every job I do was formerly done by a Biomedical Scientist (a consequence of NHS "efficiency improvements").
I've constructed an essay laying out why I consider university to be inferior to apprenticeships. It includes 11 distinct, concisely tabulated reasons and I'd appreciate hearing you're thoughts on this. Please consider viewing the table even if not the whole essay.
The abridged version:
http://tinyurl.com/univsapprentice
The full version:
http://tinyurl.com/unimprov
Thanks for reading.
Some of these numbers seem "surprising" to say the least. For example, who is employing all these extra town planning officers ? How is this data derived ?
ReplyDelete