The UK jobs market clearly took a turn for the worse
in the first quarter of the year. The number of people in work fell by 43,000
and unemployment increased by 15,000 to 2.52 million (7.8%). Men and people on temporary contracts or working as
self-employed contractors are being hit hardest by this latest bout of weakness,
suggesting that employers are primarily making adjustments to the flexible
component of the workforce in the face economic uncertainty. This helps explain
the apparent paradox of a corresponding fall in redundancies, the number of which
will generally rise only when employers are cutting their core permanent staff.
Young people aged 16-24 have also suffered a fall in
employment in the latest quarter (down 46,000) but this has not shown up in
higher youth unemployment, which has actually also fallen by 17,000 because a
large number of those in full-time education have stopped looking for part-time
jobs to supplement their student income.
The English regions have fared particularly poorly in
2013 so far. Most have registered a rise in unemployment in the first quarter,
with the notable exception of the North West which managed a sharp fall in
unemployment (down 18,000) only because a large number of people responded to
an equally sharp contraction in jobs by exiting the labour market. By contrast,
Wales and Scotland have enjoyed both decent employment growth and falling
unemployment, signalling an end to the ‘Celtic jobs drought’ of 2012.
Ironically for the English regions, while 2012 saw
strong employment growth and falling unemployment in a flat lining economy, the
slightly better GDP growth registered in the early months of 2013 has thus been
accompanied by falling employment and a renewed rise in joblessness. With
average weekly earnings now increasing at a paltry rate of just 0.4% – which
means a real cut of 2.4% relative to Consumer Price Inflation – 2013 is shaping
up to be the ‘hard slog’ year for UK workers I anticipated in my annual forecast
last December. Indeed, combining these latest pay and jobs data, the Jobs
Economist Labour Market Temperature Index (LMTI) shows that the UK jobs market
is now as cold as it was two years ago in the spring of 2011.
The LMTI is constructed from
official data on unemployment, (CPI) price inflation, nominal pay increases and
changes in average hours worked per person. A zero reading represents the
economy’s potentially attainable combination of unemployment and real pay
growth, as obtained from Office for Budget Responsibility estimates. A reading above zero indicates excess demand
for labour, a reading below zero (i.e. the chill factor) indicates deficient
demand. An increase in the reading indicates that the labour market is heating
up (conditions improving), a decrease in the reading indicates that the labour
market is cooling down (conditions deteriorating).
The labour market was at its coldest at the depth of
the recession in February 2009, at which time the LMTI reading fell to minus
13. The reading then increased and broadly stabilized through the remainder of
2009 and 2010 before moving back onto a decreasing trend through to the end of
2011. A combination of strong growth in employment, falling unemployment and
moderation in the real pay squeeze saw the LMTI reading rise to minus 5 by autumn
2012. However, since then rising unemployment and a bigger pay squeeze has
again lowered the LMTI reading, taking it back to where it was in spring 2011.
The UK labour market has proved remarkably good at creating
jobs in the past two years but only because people have been desperate to price
themselves into work. As the LMTI shows the prevailing combination of high
unemployment and falling real pay indicates a significant ongoing shortfall in
demand. People in work and jobseekers alike have now experienced five years of
severe labour market chill. And with the somewhat warmer conditions of summer
2012 having given way to a much colder 2013, life in our deep chilled jobs
market looks set to continue for some considerable time yet.
Just slightly confused about some of the figures here.
ReplyDeleteThe number of people in work fell by 43k, yet the fall in young people in employment is 46k.
Aren’t young people included in the 'number of people in work'?